This is the weirdest video response I've gotten to date:
EvG vs. LR: Evolution vs. Racism, Part 7: Extant Humanity, Neanderthals, and Skulls
EvoGen speaks in 10-second snippets stitched together. A sentence may begin with him clean shaven during the day and end with him at night in a different outfit, bearded, wearing glasses, and slipping uncontrollably (he says) into a Southern drawl. All this to refute a couple of minor statistical errors he thinks he caught me making.
I had said that there were only about 10,000 Neanderthals. Obviously, I meant that 10,000 was the population size before it went into terminal decline, not the total number that ever existed.
I had said that modern humans appeared about 100,000 years ago (based on a PBS Evolution screenshot). EvoGen made a fuss about it being closer to 200,000. Estimates vary from 100,000-200,000, but the higher-end of the range is now to be more widely accepted. I actually beat him to the punch on this. I edited out my 100,000 claim when I reuploaded my videos to EvoGen in this series:
Race and IQ Equalitarianism Destroyed: LibertarianRealist vs. EvoGen
I don't know if Neanderthals were the smarter of the two subspecies. Nor can anyone without actually being able to test Neanderthals. What we do know is that humans today with Neanderthal admixture tend to have higher IQs than sub-Saharan Africans who lack it.
For all of EvoGen's citations, none show sub-Saharan Africans performing similarly to Europeans or Asians when put in similar environments. Equal net environmental advantages don't produce equal outcomes. EvoGen still can't accept this crucial fact. The only reasonable explanation for the racial IQ orderings that persist after controlling for socioeconomic status is that they flow primarily from genetic differences.